When the Board Asks "Did We Take Reasonable Steps?"
What Will You Show Them?
Not training. Not content. Not courses. Pressure-tested rehearsal for the conversations that decide revenue, regulatory exposure, and reputation.
Trusted by Regulated Enterprises Globally





In a tribunal or a regulatory review, knowledge is not enough. They'll ask for proof of competence.
Regulators have stopped accepting tick-box compliance. The question is no longer "did you provide training?" — it's "can you prove your people could stop the harm?"
What You Have Today
Attendance. Not Assurance.
- ×Video modules and multiple-choice quizzes
- ×Completion certificates presented as "proof"
- ×Annual refreshers forgotten in weeks
- ×Passive content that can be clicked through
- ×No visibility of behaviour under pressure
- ×No defensible evidence when something goes wrong
When scrutiny comes, LMS logs do not prove competence. They prove someone watched a video.
What Scrutiny Actually Requires
Pressure-Tested. Verified. Defensible.
- ✓Live AI video simulations that recreate real risk moments
- ✓Participants must respond out loud — no scripts, no guessing
- ✓Behaviour tested under emotional and cognitive pressure
- ✓Instant scoring with transcript-level evidence
- ✓Verified pass/fail thresholds aligned to conduct standards
- ✓Audit-ready data exportable for regulators or tribunals
When scrutiny comes, you don't show attendance. You show proof of performance.
The Legal Bar Is Rising.
In Allay (UK) Ltd v Gehlen (2021), the EAT ruled brief, outdated training was insufficient to establish a "reasonable steps" defence. Attendance did not equal protection.
The Research Is Clear. The Old Approach Doesn't Work.
We didn't invent this problem. Researchers, regulators, and tribunals have been documenting it for decades.
The Behaviour Gap
Harassment training improves knowledge — but has almost no measurable effect on workplace behaviour.
Roehling et al., 2022 — Personnel Psychology (meta-analysis)Why it matters: Your people can pass a quiz and still freeze in the moment. Knowledge without practice is not a defence.
The EEOC Verdict
After reviewing 30 years of evidence, the EEOC concluded that traditional training "has not worked as a prevention tool."
EEOC Select Task Force on Workplace Harassment, 2016Why it matters: The single largest review of compliance training effectiveness, conducted by the regulator itself, found no evidence it prevents harm.
The Gallup Finding
Only 1 in 10 employees say compliance training changed how they actually work. Employees who receive poor training are indistinguishable from those who received none.
Gallup Workplace ResearchWhy it matters: If your training isn't changing behaviour, it's not reducing risk. It's consuming budget.
The Active Learning Advantage
Across 225 studies, people in passive instruction were 55% more likely to fail than those who practised actively.
Freeman et al., 2014 — Proceedings of the National Academy of SciencesWhy it matters: Watching a video is passive. Responding under pressure is active. The science is unambiguous about which one works.
This is why we don't build courses. We build pressure tests — because the evidence says that's what changes behaviour.
We Don't Sell Training. We Help You Build a "Reasonable Steps" Defence.
Three pre-built simulation packs. Each one tests real behaviour under pressure, captures full transcripts, and generates the audit-ready evidence your regulator, tribunal, or board will ask for.
MANAGER CONDUCT
Defensible Intervention Under the Worker Protection Act
For: Employee Relations, General Counsel
The Promise
Policies do not prevent claims. Manager behaviour does.
Simulations
- Harassment First Response
- Active Bystander Intervention
- Anti-Retaliation Safeguards
- Fair Performance Conversations
DATA & INFOSEC
Secure Decisions Under Social Engineering Pressure
For: CISO, DPO, General Counsel
The Promise
Cyber incidents rarely begin with broken code. They begin with pressured human decisions.
Simulations
- Identity & Verification Discipline
- Third-Party Risk Handling
- Internal Data Governance
- Breach Response — First 15 Minutes
Recreate the Real Moment
Live AI video conversations that interrupt, escalate, and apply pressure — just like the real world.
No Scripts. No Guessing.
Participants must respond out loud. If they can't say it under pressure, they don't pass.
Stress Builds Real Capability
We test behaviour — not policy recall — in high-risk scenarios aligned to your exposure.
Instant, Verifiable Evidence
Every simulation generates transcripts, behavioural scoring, and pass/fail verification.
Safe Failure. Real Protection.
Better to fail in simulation than in front of a regulator, tribunal, or customer.
The Evidence Dashboard Your Board Will Ask For.
Real-time visibility into workforce capability. Identify gaps before they become incidents. Export audit-ready evidence with one click.
Compliance Intelligence
Operational Readiness Dashboard
Vulnerability Scan by Risk Vector
View AllRegulatory Readiness Score
Readiness Locker
Three high-stakes moments your teams face every week — and have never practised once.
Each scenario recreates a real risk moment. Your people must respond live. Every word is captured, scored, and stored as evidence.
"I'm choosing between heating and eating."
Consumer Duty Readiness
A customer calls about a missed payment. Midway through, they reveal they're skipping meals. Your agent has 30 seconds to shift from "collections script" to vulnerability protocol. Do they catch the signal?
What's tested:
"It was just banter. Don't make this a thing."
Leadership Readiness
A team member reports an uncomfortable comment from a colleague. The accused says it was a joke. The manager must respond in real-time without dismissing, escalating too fast, or creating retaliation risk. Do they freeze?
What's tested:
"I need that client list now. The CEO is waiting."
Data & InfoSec Readiness
A senior VP calls demanding an unredacted customer export for a "board presentation." They're impatient, name-dropping the CEO, and pushing to bypass normal channels. Does your staff hold the line?
What's tested:
These aren't edge cases. They're Tuesday.
Deploy all three simulations to your team — or build your own in under two minutes.
Bespoke Simulations. Your Policies. Your Risk Profile.
Every organisation has exposures the standard packs don't cover. The Builder lets you create a custom simulation in under two minutes — calibrated to your policies, scored against your conduct standards, with the same audit-ready evidence output.
Describe the risk moment. Deployed in minutes.
Outline the scenario. AI generates the simulation, avatar, and scoring criteria — aligned to your policies.
Score against your conduct standards.
Define the specific behaviours you need to verify. The AI scores against your criteria, not generic benchmarks.
Results feed your evidence dashboard.
Every custom simulation generates the same audit-ready transcripts, scores, and exportable evidence as pre-built packs.
Roleplay Builder
Custom Scenarios